Indianapolis is reported to be part of the “New Heartland” of the country, according to a recent report by Brookings Institution that studied the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas based on their growth, diversity and education.
In the report, Indianapolis is compared with cities such as: Atlanta; Charlotte, N.C.; Kansas City, Mo.; Portland, Ore.; and Richmond, Va., which are all reported as “New Heartland” cities as well.
But what is meant by “New Heartland?” New Heartland is one of the seven categories that the Brookings Institute divided the 100 metro areas into based on demographical data obtained from the Census Bureau’s annual American Community Survey. New Heartland cities are fast-growing, high-education areas, but have lower shares of Hispanic and Asian populations than the national average.
Indianapolis was reported as being characterized by its high growth, and high education, and according to the study, was one of the fastest growing areas in the Midwest between 2000 and 2008.
How Indianapolis compares with other "New Heartland" cities:
Population:
Indianapolis: 1,715,459
Atlanta: 5,376,285
Charlotte, N.C.: 1,701,799
Kansas City, Mo.: 2,002,047
Portland, Ore.: 2,207,462
Richmond, Va.: 1,225,626
Increase in population between 2000 and 2008:
Indianapolis: 12 percent
Atlanta: 25.6 percent
Charlotte, N.C.: 27 percent
Kansas City, Mo.: 8.6 percent
Portland, Ore.: 14 percent
Richmond, Va.: 11.4 percent
Diversity – Nonwhite population:
National average: 35 percent
Indianapolis: 23 percent
Atlanta: 46.8 percent
Charlotte, N.C.: 36.3 percent
Kansas City, Mo.: 23.4 percent
Portland, Ore.: 22.2 percent
Richmond, Va.: 38.1 percent
Higher education – Adult population (25+) with a bachelor’s degree:
Indianapolis: 32 percent
Atlanta: 34.6 percent
Charlotte, N.C.: 32 percent
Kansas City, Mo.: 31.9 percent
Portland, Ore.: 33.3 percent
Richmond, Va.: 30.6 percent
Median household income:
Indianapolis: $54,587
Atlanta: $60,928
Charlotte, N.C.: $55,394
Kansas City, Mo.: $56,762
Portland, Ore.: $59,044
Richmond, Va.: $58,980
David Wu, policy director for Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard, said in an article from the Indianapolis Star, “I think population growth is always a good sign that you’re doing something right, that people want to come there.”
The Urbanophile, Aaron Renn, an opinion-leading urban affairs analyst, communicated the same idea in his keynote address at the Indy Partnership annual meeting in April. He reported that Indianapolis is number one in population growth—by a lot, compared to its Midwest peers. In fact, Indianapolis is actually growing 50% faster than the national average.
Here is a brief excerpt from Renn's keynote speech:
"But more telling than population growth is a statistic called net migration. This is just what it sounds like. It’s the number of people who moved in minus the number of people who moved out. If you think about it, this is really the ultimate verdict on a city. It’s people voting with their feet about where they want to live. So let’s take a look. Indianapolis is number one again. I’m beginning to notice at trend already. A net of almost 65,000 people moved to Indianapolis in the first eight years of the last decade. That’s the equivalent of the entire population of [suburb] Fishers packing up from where ever they are and moving to Indy. It’s more than twice as many as the next nearest city on the list. And as you can see, the Midwest is a place most people want to move away from, but not here, not this city. Indianapolis is a place where people want to be, to plant their flag, seek their fortune, and build a better future for themselves and their families."
The Indianapolis Star article on this study
Sources: U.S. Census and analysis by Brookings Institute